On Jul 6, 2010, at 9:10 AM, James Tucker wrote:

>=20
> On 6 Jul 2010, at 16:49, Yusuke Endoh wrote:
>=20
>> Issue #3140 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
>>=20
>>=20
>> Hi,
>>=20
>> I set a deadline of this discussion: 7/10 (Sat) 23:59 JST.
>> 1.9.2 will be released in status quo unless we can agree on concrete
>> solution and write a patch.
>>=20
>> IMO, it is no use just to complain.  It is too late to broaden the
>> discussion.  Let's focus on the issue at hand, and please write a
>> patch yourself.
>=20
> I have. http://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/compare/master...perflude
>=20
>> Or, complain directly to the maintainer for rubygems.
>=20
> I am.
>=20
> Is the above patch to rubygems actually acceptable for inclusion (via =
rubygems/fast.rb) to be included into ruby as a replacement for =
gem_prelude?

No, the patch isn't acceptable as going into 1.9.2, because it has not =
gone through the normal rigor of rubygems testing. I see a few issues =
with it straight away.

 - Evan

>=20
>> --=20
>> Yusuke Endoh <mame / tsg.ne.jp>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3140
>>=20
>> ----------------------------------------
>> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org
>>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20