--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 04:22:22PM +0900, Roger Pack wrote:
> > I have to agree.  ¨Â§í óôéìôòùéîç ôï æéçõòå ïõôèõôéìéôïæ
> > gem_prelude while sifting through code and attempting to resolve this
> > issue.
> >
> > Why do we have gem prelude?
> 
> Because it allows us to avoid loading full rubygems, which takes quite
> awhile on windows and jruby, and in general loads a lot of unnecessary
> functionality [1]

Why can't we opt-in to a faster rubygems, rather than having one shoved
down our throats?  I'd rather see gem_prelude.rb moved to ext and opt in
to using it.

-- 
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMM0guAAoJEJUxcLy0/6/GKogH/iIn7FukbyBAlMn4cH6ltiGs
RXB3Sg7RoCuazxLNVdHx55FRiShHBO8KPysDkZJV9QtAofrbEVOMaEmRX6xZnrds
u+OYtlHtqoESZV/6b8bv/ZyyMSk8J221cZS6CtAhCaNP9Efc66LC5FbY1FEDpXqu
5+B4uqq9r3XtdC+qdQ2L0L/qFG3zMF5z4w/mNnn54su4G3ELrgWwoF8uW8Gi7hty
Rp8kP/HA2kJnwJ6T8T42pppdLIdUUN1Jf7+4WuDLfAGGi6IiWVnLdNWaPBcwtgqE
PPjjBGrZksf0A/BGGxhOLEtij6EeKzAgyuCAtT89Q9R27LRzTWna9dIe/FjJUtYgS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--