< :前の番号
^ :番号順リスト
> :次の番号
P :前の記事（スレッド移動）
N :次の記事（スレッド移動）
|<:前のスレッド
>|:次のスレッド
^ :返事先
_:自分への返事
>:同じ返事先を持つ記事（前）
<:同じ返事先を持つ記事（後）
---:分割してスレッド表示、再表示
| :分割して（縦）スレッド表示、再表示
~ :スレッドのフレーム消去
.:インデックス
..:インデックスのインデックス
Bug #3331: Suppress Warning: class <<self
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3331
Author: Benoit Daloze
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Category: lib, Target version: 1.9.x
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3dev (2010-05-14 trunk 27796) [x86_64-darwin10.3.0]
Hi,
Running a simple program under trunk with warnings, I got one that could be solved very easily:
`<<' after local variable is interpreted as binary operator
even though it seems like here document
It is indeed not interpreted as one of these,
but it can be disturbing for the parser and the reader.
"class << self" should only be written as I just did,
neither "class <<self", nor "class<<self"
(the latter being mainly used for Module#singleton_class with class<<self;self;end)
Here is the stats:
$ grep -r 'class <<self' . | wc -l #=> 2
$ grep -r 'class<<self' . | wc -l #=> 5
$ grep -r 'class << self' . | wc -l #=> 180
So here is the patch, I just changed the 7 cases here above.
I also indented lib/irb/cmd/fork.rb because the change was minimal.
Is ruby-core interested in avoiding warnings?
I think it can really help to use the warning flag, but if the output is already filled with ruby's internals, it's very hard to find what you want.
The patch attached is the output of `git format-patch`, tell me if it needs to be another format.
Regards,
B.D.
PS: Do you have any idea how to solve that one and what is the real meaning of it?:
warning: character class has duplicated range: /[\s\t\r\n\f]+/
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org