On 5/15/10, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro / gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
>> [[a slick little patch to just use setpriority]]
>>
>> And that works?!?
>
> Do you mean my test result is not enough?

No, I believe you. (Haven't been able to test it myself yet...
networking issues on my development laptop.) It's just that I was
astonished that it could be so easy.

It's a very nice little patch you made; thanks for doing it.

> MacOS X, Solaris, Windows have each different changing way.
> There isn't POSIX standard in this area unfortunatelly.
>
> Plus we already windows one, see
> thread_win32.c#native_thread_apply_priority().
>
> However, Some OS doesn't have per-thread priority feature at all. So,
> I don't think your patch is useless. My intention was, I hoped to clarify
> why you don't use setpriority() nor another os feature. your patch
> didn't describe it.

Ok, good. I think I should merge our patches together.