Hi,

2010/3/22 James Gray <redmine / ruby-lang.org>:
> Is there any chance we could get this incorporated before the 1.9.2 feature freeze?


This ticket is not simple since this feature seems to be against "Large
Class Principle".  We need matz's approval.


My current personal opinion is that it is appropriate for the feature to
be just a part of set.rb as a back-end, instead of a first class library.

Is there case where we want to use RBTree directly, instead of set.rb?

-- 
Yusuke ENDOH <mame / tsg.ne.jp>