Hi,

In message "Re: [ruby-core:28206] Is Math module a wrapper of libm?"
    on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:17:08 +0900, Yusuke ENDOH <mame / tsg.ne.jp> writes:

|It is good to decide the policy of Math.  Please choice:
|
|1) Math is still just a wrapper of libm
|2) Math is (aims to be) platform-independent math module
|   (though it is very similar to libm's API)

I choose #2.  I also want Math module to work with complex and
rational as much as their support is reasonable.

							matz.