On 11.01.10 15:27, Paul Brannan wrote:
> ...  In the end I went on a
> 2-month vacation, and when I came back, the entire application had been
> rewritten in C++.
> 
> (in Ruby's defense here, the next 1-2 months of my time when I got back
> were spent fixing the C++ code and adding missing features.  So the
> perceived cost of C++ was lower, but in the end the actual cost ended up
> being much higher than the team expected).
and is it faster/more responsive now?

[murphy]