Hi,

2009/12/9 Brian Ford <redmine / ruby-lang.org>:
> I'm concerned with simply saying this should be implementation defined. That's a really slippery slope. People's code will rely on this behavior. And it seems important enough to specify. Could we please get Matz's opinion on this.

Matz said that he prefer the behavior of Ruby 1.8.
How do you feel, ko1?

-- 
Shugo Maeda