On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 09:21:06PM +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
> Aaron Patterson wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 12:59:25AM +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
> >> Jon wrote:
> >>> If you're looking at alternatives, does http://pyyaml.org/wiki/LibYAML
> >>> look potentially interesting?
> >> Yes, it looks good if someone port to ruby and maintain it.
> > 
> > I will:
> > 
> >   https://github.com/tenderlove/psych
> 
> It seems good (thought it needs more docs and implementation).

Yes, it definitely needs more documentation.  It passes *most* of the
current Syck tests, although syck supports some syntax that isn't
allowed by the YAML spec.

-- 
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/