> > Issue #2340 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
> >
> >
> >> Agreed with precondition.  But do we have alternative?
> >
> > Currently no.
> > So this ticket intends to call for alternative or maintainer.
> >
> > But if no proposal, YAML/Syck should be removed in Ruby 2.0 even if  
> > no alternative.
> 
> YAML is a very popular library, unfortunately.  Rails also uses it.   
> People will definitely notice if we remove it.
> 
> James Edward Gray II

If you're looking at alternatives, does http://pyyaml.org/wiki/LibYAML look potentially interesting?

Jon