On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu / ruby-lang.org>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> At Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:06:45 +0900,
> Ryan Davis wrote in [ruby-core:25763]:
> > Not really. YAML is important and syck is (afaik) the best library for
> > the job, AT THIS TIME. I think that could change, but not without
> > effort.
>
> I doubt that syck is "the best"; IIRC, it isn't YAML 1.0 and
> out of date?
>
> --
> Nobu Nakada
>
>
An FFI binding to the C-based, YAML 1.1 parser/emitter at
http://pyyaml.org/wiki/LibYAML ?

The "...Note: the API may change drastically...." is interesting...wonder if
it's 100% abstracted away from its Python binding.