--0016e6d99ef59b88d304749576ed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu / ruby-lang.org>wrote: > Hi, > > At Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:06:45 +0900, > Ryan Davis wrote in [ruby-core:25763]: > > Not really. YAML is important and syck is (afaik) the best library for > > the job, AT THIS TIME. I think that could change, but not without > > effort. > > I doubt that syck is "the best"; IIRC, it isn't YAML 1.0 and > out of date? > > -- > Nobu Nakada > > An FFI binding to the C-based, YAML 1.1 parser/emitter at http://pyyaml.org/wiki/LibYAML ? The "...Note: the API may change drastically...." is interesting...wonder if it's 100% abstracted away from its Python binding. --0016e6d99ef59b88d304749576ed Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <span dir="ltr"><nobu / ruby-lang.org></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi,<br> <br> At Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:06:45 +0900,<br> Ryan Davis wrote in [ruby-core:25763]:<br> > Not really. YAML is important and syck is (afaik) the best library for<br> > the job, AT THIS TIME. I think that could change, but not without<br> > effort.<br> <br> I doubt that syck is "the best"; IIRC, it isn't YAML 1.0 and<br> out of date?<br> <font color="#888888"><br> --<br> Nobu Nakada<br> <br> </font></blockquote></div><br>An FFI binding to the C-based, YAML 1.1 parser/emitter at http://pyyaml.org/wiki/LibYAML ?<br><br>The "...Note: the API may change drastically...." is interesting...wonder if it's 100% abstracted away fromts Python binding.<br> --0016e6d99ef59b88d304749576ed--