--0016e6d99ef59b88d304749576ed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu / ruby-lang.org>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> At Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:06:45 +0900,
> Ryan Davis wrote in [ruby-core:25763]:
> > Not really. YAML is important and syck is (afaik) the best library for
> > the job, AT THIS TIME. I think that could change, but not without
> > effort.
>
> I doubt that syck is "the best"; IIRC, it isn't YAML 1.0 and
> out of date?
>
> --
> Nobu Nakada
>
>
An FFI binding to the C-based, YAML 1.1 parser/emitter at
http://pyyaml.org/wiki/LibYAML ?

The "...Note: the API may change drastically...." is interesting...wonder if
it's 100% abstracted away from its Python binding.

--0016e6d99ef59b88d304749576ed
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <span dir="ltr">&lt;nobu / ruby-lang.org&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<br>
<br>
At Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:06:45 +0900,<br>
Ryan Davis wrote in [ruby-core:25763]:<br>
&gt; Not really. YAML is important and syck is (afaik) the best library for<br>
&gt; the job, AT THIS TIME. I think that could change, but not without<br>
&gt; effort.<br>
<br>
I doubt that syck is &quot;the best&quot;; IIRC, it isn&#39;t YAML 1.0 and<br>
out of date?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Nobu Nakada<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>An FFI binding to the C-based, YAML 1.1 parser/emitter at http://pyyaml.org/wiki/LibYAML ?<br><br>The &quot;...Note: the API may change drastically....&quot; is interesting...wonder if it&#39;s 100% abstracted away fromts Python binding.<br>

--0016e6d99ef59b88d304749576ed--