On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz / ruby-lang.org> wr=
ote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: [ruby-core:25713] [Bug #2131] f(not x) =3D> syntax error"
> =A0 =A0on Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:13:06 +0900, "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@r=
uby-lang.org> writes:
>
> |This should have been classified as a feature request.
> |
> |Since (not x) is legal syntax, it is my opinion that f(not x) should be =
legal.
>
> So, do you mean a,b,c =3D 1,2,3 is legal syntax, should we allow
> f(a,b,c =3D 1,2,3) ?

or even

  f(class Foo;attr_accessor :bar;end;Foo.new.x=3D5)

<G>

--=20
Rick DeNatale

Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale