On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz / ruby-lang.org> wr= ote: > Hi, > > In message "Re: [ruby-core:25713] [Bug #2131] f(not x) =3D> syntax error" > =A0 =A0on Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:13:06 +0900, "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@r= uby-lang.org> writes: > > |This should have been classified as a feature request. > | > |Since (not x) is legal syntax, it is my opinion that f(not x) should be = legal. > > So, do you mean a,b,c =3D 1,2,3 is legal syntax, should we allow > f(a,b,c =3D 1,2,3) ? or even f(class Foo;attr_accessor :bar;end;Foo.new.x=3D5) <G> --=20 Rick DeNatale Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale