On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Aaron
Patterson<aaron / tenderlovemaking.com> wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2009, at 7:43 PM, Leonard Chin wrote:
>
>> If readline's change in license is the primary reason for reevaluating
>> Ruby's licensing,
>> why not consider the option of replacing readline?
>>
>> Although far from mature, Luis Lavena and others were working on a
>> pure Ruby clone
>> of readline: http://github.com/luislavena/rb-readline/tree/master
>>
>> With more work, this could provide a reasonable happy alternative.
>
> IIRC, ruby on OSX links against EditLine (libedit) instead of readline.
>  ¨Βιβεδιτ υσεσ ΒΣμιγεξσε®  ¨Βουμδ χε κυστ δεπεξδ οξ μιβεδιιξστεαδζ
> readline?
>
>  ¨ΒττπΊ――χχχ®τθςωσοεε®δλ―εδιτμιξε>

Isn't editline dependent of a working (n)curses? Or has that changed
over the years?

-- 
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-ExupρΣy