--0016e6d27c9082e7a8046bfb5316 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 2009/6/10 James Coglan <jcoglan / googlemail.com> > Quick question, is there a reason why Observable uses an Array for storage > instead of a Set? Wouldn't a Set be faster, especially for removing > observers? Are there other places in the standard library where use of data > structures could be improved? > Gah, I was looking at the 1.8 lib. 1.9 uses a Hash. Sorry! --0016e6d27c9082e7a8046bfb5316 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/6/10 James Coglan <span dir="ltr"><jcoglan / googlemail.com></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div><div></div><div class="h5">Quick question, is there a reason why Observable uses an Array for storage instead of a Set? Wouldn't a Set be faster, especially for removing observers? Are there other places in the standard library where use of data structures could be improved?</div> </div></blockquote><div><br><br>Gah, I was looking at the 1.8 lib. 1.9 usesash. Sorry! <br></div></div><br> --0016e6d27c9082e7a8046bfb5316--