--0016e6d27c9082e7a8046bfb5316
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

2009/6/10 James Coglan <jcoglan / googlemail.com>

> Quick question, is there a reason why Observable uses an Array for storage
> instead of a Set? Wouldn't a Set be faster, especially for removing
> observers? Are there other places in the standard library where use of data
> structures could be improved?
>


Gah, I was looking at the 1.8 lib. 1.9 uses a Hash. Sorry!

--0016e6d27c9082e7a8046bfb5316
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/6/10 James Coglan <span dir="ltr">&lt;jcoglan / googlemail.com&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">Quick question, is there a reason why Observable uses an Array for storage instead of a Set? Wouldn&#39;t a Set be faster, especially for removing observers? Are there other places in the standard library where use of data structures could be improved?</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br><br>Gah, I was looking at the 1.8 lib. 1.9 usesash. Sorry! <br></div></div><br>

--0016e6d27c9082e7a8046bfb5316--