Hi,

At Thu, 29 Jan 2004 22:51:09 +0900,
Dave Thomas wrote:
> > And, sorry but another problem, I'd like to document
> > xxx_init_copy() as clone and dup methods, instead of
> > initialize_copy, because I feel initialize_copy must not be
> > called externally.  Is this possible?
> >
> 
> Is this for cases where there isn't already a dup or a clone method? Or 

Now #dup and #clone belong to Kernel, and they call
#initialize_copy for particular class, so each classes don't
have these two methods.  It is close to the relation between
Class#new and Object#initialize, I guess.

> would it work simply to support :nodoc: in the C parser?

Right now, xxx_init_copy's are :nodoc:ed.

-- 
Nobu Nakada