Hi,

At Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:22:35 +0900,
Charlie Savage wrote in [ruby-core:22996]:
> I tested r23017 (ok), r23023 (breaks here), r23025 (still
> broken) and r23031 (still broken).  So the error is still
> occurring.  The data I pasted from the bug report above was
> generated using r23031.

Then why did you cite the code from r23025?

-- 
Nobu Nakada