Hi, At Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:22:35 +0900, Charlie Savage wrote in [ruby-core:22996]: > I tested r23017 (ok), r23023 (breaks here), r23025 (still > broken) and r23031 (still broken). So the error is still > occurring. The data I pasted from the bug report above was > generated using r23031. Then why did you cite the code from r23025? -- Nobu Nakada