Hi, At Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:00:22 +0900, Charlie Savage wrote in [ruby-core:22868]: > I'm curious why you rejected this patch. Is there any real > difference between Ruby opening the file or openssl opening > the file? IO isn't always associated with a file, and the file may has been renamed or unlinked. > The reason I think it is important is that it causes a > segmentation fault if you mix runtime libraries on Windows. > Say a Windows developer downloads Openssl binaries from here > (this is the recommended link from the openssl home page): What about errno? -- Nobu Nakada