Hi,

At Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:00:22 +0900,
Charlie Savage wrote in [ruby-core:22868]:
> I'm curious why you rejected this patch.  Is there any real
> difference between Ruby opening the file or openssl opening
> the file?

IO isn't always associated with a file, and the file may has
been renamed or unlinked.

> The reason I think it is important is that it causes a
> segmentation fault if you mix runtime libraries on Windows.
> Say a Windows developer downloads Openssl binaries from here
> (this is the recommended link from the openssl home page):

What about errno?

-- 
Nobu Nakada