Hi, > From: "Dave Thomas" <dave / pragprog.com> > Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 10:51 PM > > 2. "./ruby rdoc" might require libruby.so, syck.so, etc. The trick > > in rubytest.rb cannot do everything (such as digest/digest/md5). > > I know current depending libs of rdoc does not require digest/md5, > > but it could be someday I think. > > The surprising thing to me is that I thought YAML could fall back on > using the Ruby-based code if the .so was not available. If that was the > case, the RDoc would run with no special additional work. Is my > understanding of YAML wrong? yaml/parser is deprecated. [ruby-talk:72859] Building directory layout could not be the same as installed directory layout. The trick is TechnicalDebt, IMO. Regards, // NaHi