Hi,

> From: "Dave Thomas" <dave / pragprog.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 10:51 PM

> > 2. "./ruby rdoc" might require libruby.so, syck.so, etc.  The trick
> >   in rubytest.rb cannot do everything (such as digest/digest/md5).
> >   I know current depending libs of rdoc does not require digest/md5,
> >   but it could be someday I think.
> 
> The surprising thing to me is that I thought YAML could fall back on 
> using the Ruby-based code if the .so was not available. If that was the 
> case, the RDoc would run with no special additional work. Is my 
> understanding of YAML wrong?

yaml/parser is deprecated. [ruby-talk:72859]

Building directory layout could not be the same as installed
directory layout.  The trick is TechnicalDebt, IMO.

Regards,
// NaHi