On Jan 13, 2004, at 0:46, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote: > 2. "./ruby rdoc" might require libruby.so, syck.so, etc. The trick > in rubytest.rb cannot do everything (such as digest/digest/md5). > I know current depending libs of rdoc does not require digest/md5, > but it could be someday I think. The surprising thing to me is that I thought YAML could fall back on using the Ruby-based code if the .so was not available. If that was the case, the RDoc would run with no special additional work. Is my understanding of YAML wrong? Cheers Dave