On Jan 13, 2004, at 0:46, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:

> 2. "./ruby rdoc" might require libruby.so, syck.so, etc.  The trick
>   in rubytest.rb cannot do everything (such as digest/digest/md5).
>   I know current depending libs of rdoc does not require digest/md5,
>   but it could be someday I think.

The surprising thing to me is that I thought YAML could fall back on 
using the Ruby-based code if the .so was not available. If that was the 
case, the RDoc would run with no special additional work. Is my 
understanding of YAML wrong?

Cheers

Dave