On Tuesday, January 13, 2004, 7:00:36 PM, why wrote:

> Thank you, Nahi.  Sorry, was a thoughtless omission on my part.  Lazy
> loading is the preferred.  Fixed in HEAD.

What about the 1.8 branch?  Is that relevant here?

Gavin



> NAKAMURA, Hiroshi (nahi / keynauts.com) wrote:
>> 
>> Lazy "date" loading code in rubyext.c was deleted.
>> http://www.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ruby/ext/syck/rubyext.c?cvsroot=src&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
>> 
>> _why, if you don't want lazy loading of "date" module
>> (and do not supoprt --with-static-linked-ext),
>> why don't you rollback changes in
>> http://www.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ruby/ext/syck/rubyext.c?cvsroot=src&r1=1.30&r2=1.31
>> ?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> // NaHi
>>