Hi,

At Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:16:05 +0900,
Dave Thomas wrote:
> I notivce that there're a bunch of new xxx_init_copy methods: RDoc is 
> complaining that they're not documented.
> 
> Should they be documented, or are they for internal use? That is: 
> should they appear in the list of methods for a class?

They are called interally by clone/dup like as initialize
called by class method new.  So I guess they'd better appear,
IMHO.

-- 
Nobu Nakada