Hi, Dave, > From: "Dave Thomas" <dave / pragprog.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:50 PM Subject: Re: Best way to install ri documentation -- please check this > >> Not sure why a dependency check in necessary. It's either going to > >> work or fail. Seems too complicated to try to match version of > >> installed ruby to wd ruby... > > > > Agreed. bin and doc (if user wants) should be built and installed > > at a time. No dependency needed I think now. > Would install be dependent on rdoc? > > install: rdoc > ... > > If not, folks would probably forget to do it, and if so we're back > where we started... Sorry. I had not to mix the topic. According to the topic about enabling/disabling rdoc by default, it's only me who dislike building and installing rdoc by default. I'm "the minority." My hands will get used to living with "install-nodoc" soon. > > Hmm. How about target "rdoc" builds documents at somewhere then > > "install" copies it to specified location? This is just an idea to build bin and rdoc at a time (these combined use is a must) and do dependency check correctly. OT. Regards, // NaHi