>
>> In case this is not already resolved, I'd like to request the removal of
>> ...
>> 19 levels ... in non-rescued Ruby stack traces. Or, at the very least, the
>> ability to turn of the truncation via an option. With more and more Ruby
>> code taking the form of libraries, it is becoming more and more likely
>> that
>> the important stack frame is in the middle, rather than the top or bottom,
>> of the stack.

Looks like this has been fixed in 1.9 and 1.8.7 at least. Thanks
whoever did that.
-=r