> >> In case this is not already resolved, I'd like to request the removal of >> ... >> 19 levels ... in non-rescued Ruby stack traces. Or, at the very least, the >> ability to turn of the truncation via an option. With more and more Ruby >> code taking the form of libraries, it is becoming more and more likely >> that >> the important stack frame is in the middle, rather than the top or bottom, >> of the stack. Looks like this has been fixed in 1.9 and 1.8.7 at least. Thanks whoever did that. -=r