Gary Wright wrote:
> Did you mean to say  "no way to *safely* require files in separate 
> threads at the same time"? I'm not sure, but I think we are saying the 
> same thing:  multiple threads attempting require/load at the same time 
> is bad.

I mean that with a single require lock, there's no way to require files 
in separate threads concurrently. Which may be what we're looking for, I 
agree.

- Charlie