On Dec 4, 1:25 ¨Âí¬ ÃèáòìåÏìéöåò Îõôôåò ¼ãèáòìåó®îõô®®®Àóõî®ãïí¾
wrote:
> Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> > I mentioned about fragility just because that will be an issue for
> > Ruby 2.0.  ¨Âïò ÍÒòåðìáãéîãïòå íåôèïäáææåãô ìåóóêõóô âåãáõó> > core functionality is done by C functions.  ¨Âõô éíðìáîôáôéïî ìéëå
> > Rubinius suffers more.  ¨Â ôèéî÷å ÷éìì óïïî îååä ôï óôáòäéóãõóóéîç
> > separating/protecting core implementation from user code by some kind
> > of namespaces or packages.
>
> I agree. There's no practical reason anyone should be able to override
> Fixnum#+, after all, and protecting the core simplifies implementation
> and optimization too.

Hey, leave my foot alone! I'll shoot it if I dang well want to!