On Nov 23, 2008, at 9:49 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:

> In case this is not already resolved, I'd like to request the  
> removal of ...
> 19 levels ... in non-rescued Ruby stack traces. Or, at the very  
> least, the
> ability to turn of the truncation via an option. With more and more  
> Ruby
> code taking the form of libraries, it is becoming more and more  
> likely that
> the important stack frame is in the middle, rather than the top or  
> bottom,
> of the stack.

YES!  Please.

-- 
-- Jim Weirich
-- jim.weirich / gmail.com