< :前の番号
^ :番号順リスト
> :次の番号
P :前の記事
N :次の記事
|<:スレッドの先頭
>|:次のスレッド
^ :返事先
_:自分への返事
>:同じ返事先を持つ記事（前）
<:同じ返事先を持つ記事（後）
---:分割してスレッド表示、再表示
| :分割して（縦）スレッド表示、再表示
~ :スレッドのフレーム消去
.:インデックス
..:インデックスのインデックス
On Dec 15, 2003, at 15:59, Chad Fowler wrote:
> OWe have actually been doing the following for RubyGems (so far--we're
> of
> course open for suggestions):
>
> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/#{ruby_version}/doc/#{gem_name}-#{gem_version}
>
> ...this is, of course, the standard rdoc html output--not the new ri
> intermediate form.
The problem here is that 'ri' will have a hard job finding the most
current among all these directories: I'm keen not to slow things down
too much.
It would be nice to have symbolic links so that:
gems/1.8/doc/fred-latest
could always reference the latest version of 'fred' that's installed,
but I guess that couldn't work under Windows. Perhaps the simplest
thing would be always to install documentation to
site_ruby/1.8/doc/...
and _also_ install it under the gems structure above. That way, 'ri
fred' would always find the last version installed, while you could
geta specific version by giving ri a path to the specific doc
directory:
ri -d /usr/local/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/...
However, I'd also question the gems structure here. Shouldn't the gems
stuff be under site_ruby? Perhaps
/usr/local/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/gems/....
I have to admit I'm still confused by the Ruby directory standards:
some clarification would be very helpful from matz....
Cheers
Dave