Roger Pack wrote:
> Oh I'm favor of it--I would however suggest that allowing for
> "docstrings" and/or parse trees of methods would be even more powerful
> overall :)

Docstrings for sure. I've lobbied for such in the past, but never had 
time to make a strong enough case :)

Exposed parse trees are a big fat can of worms. I'd agree to limited 
expression trees being added in specific cases, though.

- Charlie