Hi,

At Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:24:46 +0900,
Lavir the Whiolet wrote in [ruby-core:19132]:
> "with" operator is required. It must work like an ordinary
> method which gets one arguemnt and a block. All expressions
> in the block are not required to point the argument
> explicitly; all method calls are related to the argument by
> default.

No.  I'd implemented and tested it once but found it's just
problematic rather than useful.  For instance, how do you
consider about instance variables?

-- 
Nobu Nakada