On Sep 28, 11:35 ¨Âí¬ ¢Çòåçïòù Âòï÷î¢ ¼çòåçïòù®ô®âò®®®Àçíáéì®ãïíwrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:02 PM, James Gray <ja... / grayproductions.net> wrote:
> > On Sep 28, 2008, at 6:10 PM, Trans wrote:
> >> That's not really true. Look at the download numbers for miniunit
> >> (http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=1040). I wouldn't call that
> >> traction. It's adoption into stdlib has more to do with who's pushing
> >> it then anything else. That's not so say it isn't a worthy
> >> replacement. I think on the whole it probably is, but that lends
> >> itself more to my argument.
>
> It's a bad idea to quote RubyForge statistics, the download numbers
> have been wrong for some time, especially for gems.

That's disappointing. It's hard to count on anything these days :-(

T.