>> Yeah I was thinking it would be less confusing to only have one
>> function name [source_location] and have it apply to both proc and
>> method.
>
> Meanwhile, I added the methods without changing the function
> names.  The names are another story.
>
> # I've thought I'd committed it already, but forgotten.

Thanks for adding those.  I see them in SVN now.
I prefer #source_location but #location is livable :)

>> Also note that it was mentioned that Binding#source_location would be
>> nice--I just have no idea how to add it so the current patch doesn't
>> include it.
>
> What is the line number of Binding?

There isn't one in that patch.  I'm unsure how to create Binding#source_location
Thanks!
-=R