>> Yeah I was thinking it would be less confusing to only have one >> function name [source_location] and have it apply to both proc and >> method. > > Meanwhile, I added the methods without changing the function > names. The names are another story. > > # I've thought I'd committed it already, but forgotten. Thanks for adding those. I see them in SVN now. I prefer #source_location but #location is livable :) >> Also note that it was mentioned that Binding#source_location would be >> nice--I just have no idea how to add it so the current patch doesn't >> include it. > > What is the line number of Binding? There isn't one in that patch. I'm unsure how to create Binding#source_location Thanks! -=R