On Sep 25, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Ryan Davis wrote:
>> Does it make sense to have require 'test/unit' be a test/unit  
>> compatible shim on top of mini/test?  Then require 'mini/test' can  
>> use all the improved nomenclature and techniques.
>>

> That is EXACTLY what test/unit.rb is and it has been like that and  
> released for review for almost a year...

Well, to be fair, it isn't really compatible.


Dave