Hi,

At Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:38:30 +0900,
Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
> I'd prefer something more explicit than 'trb', perhaps 'testruby', 
> 'test-ruby', or even 'testrb'.

The last sounds good to me.

> Also, it seems that whatever it gets called should completely replace 
> runner.rb in the test directory; what do you think?

runner.rb so passes its own directory that we can omit
arguments.  In other words, now runner.rb is the marker
indicating where tests to run are.

-- 
Nobu Nakada