On Jul 24, 2008, at 9:53 PM, Daniel Luz wrote:

> So, when writing those specs, I tried to find a minimum of encodings  
> which would be available on any implementation from the last couple  
> years (the most common Unicode-related ones), and then tried to use  
> the least common denominator I could find among some platforms  
> (basically, whatever libraries were being used by the common Ruby  
> distributions on Windows, OS X and Ubuntu). This, of course, could  
> still fail on some implementations, so feel free to remove those  
> problematic tests.

Thanks Jeremy, Nobuyoshi and Daniel. Following Daniel's advice I've  
removed the two tests at least until there's some standarization on  
these issues.

If you see any other problem please let us know.

--
Federico