On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Trans <transfire / gmail.com> wrote:
> Might we ever imagine a time when YAML is an integral part of Ruby?
> That is to say that one wouldn't even need to "require 'yaml'"?
>
> And, too take it a step further, that the YAML library might be
> improved and better integrated --perhaps even to go so far as to
> create a LINQ style integration?
>
> I ask, because at this point it's rare that I write a program that
> doesn't require 'yaml'; from loading config files to dumping debug
> output, I find it generally indispensable.
>

We can also wish works?

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/browse_thread/thread/16b633959fe5ea88#

-- 
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from
the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent
disinclination to do so.
Douglas Adams