Tanaka Akira wrote:
> In article <4867A6AC.4060902 / pragmaticraft.com>,
>   Igal Koshevoy <igal / pragmaticraft.com> writes:
>   
>> However, there are some unguarded REXML examples that are failing, which 
>> may indicate a new Ruby bug/incompatibility.
>>     
>
> In your log, which is not guarded?
>   
Sorry, I was wrong. I've reviewed all the REXML errors and they seem to 
be accounted for by stale version numbers in the spec.

The current guard lines read like this:
  ruby_bug "#17910", "1.8.6.114" do

What should these sorts of lines be changed to if no official version of 
MRI supports the code in these examples? "1.8.6"? "1.8"?

-igal