--pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_Jun__3_23:42:45_2008-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

At Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:03:23 +0900,
David A. Black wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
>
> > At Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:39:10 +0900,
> > I wrote:
> >> Sounds reasonable, considering in addition that Array#map and
> >> Array#select supports subclasses.
> >
> > Turns out it was wrong..  I'll back out the change.
>
> I believe you but I'm curious what you decided was wrong about it. Was
> it that it would make Set the only class that didn't #map back to an
> array? (On reflection I probably agree that having exactly one such
> class is worse than having none.)

It was my assumption that was wrong.  I thought Array#collect returns
an object of the receiver's class so I changed it without asking, but
I realized it didn't.  So I reverted the change and decided to wait
for the discussion to reach conclusions.  That's all.  Let's keep the
discussion.

--
Akinori MUSHA / http://akinori.org/

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_Jun__3_23:42:45_2008-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAkhFWGUACgkQkgvvx5/Z4e4DPQCfZ4heogNYT7BJnXlBnQ2UlHFW
rrsAn2+syOV4GkLtc05LMcspu9QXV40w
Zz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_Jun__3_23:42:45_2008-1--