Hi --

On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Akinori MUSHA wrote:

> At Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:39:10 +0900,
> I wrote:
>> Sounds reasonable, considering in addition that Array#map and
>> Array#select supports subclasses.
>
> Turns out it was wrong..  I'll back out the change.

I believe you but I'm curious what you decided was wrong about it. Was
it that it would make Set the only class that didn't #map back to an
array? (On reflection I probably agree that having exactly one such
class is worse than having none.)


David

-- 
Rails training from David A. Black and Ruby Power and Light:
   INTRO TO RAILS         June 9-12            Berlin
   ADVANCING WITH RAILS   June 16-19           Berlin
See http://www.rubypal.com for details and updates!