Subject: Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz ruby-lang.org>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:12:00 +0900
In-reply-to: 16726
Hi,
In message "Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on"
on Mon, 12 May 2008 10:58:36 +0900, Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342 / gmail.com> writes:
|What about "fn" or "fun", for "function"?
Could be. I feel function is too long.
matz.