Hi Ryan,

It seems that you are too busy to maintain Test::Unit.
If this is true, could you consider that you give me the
Test::Unit maintenance rights?


Thanks,
--
kou

In <20080226.200251.216579816165677384.kou / cozmixng.org>
  "Re: Test::Unit maintainer" on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:02:52 +0900,
  Kouhei Sutou <kou / cozmixng.org> wrote:

> Hi Ryan,
> 
> In <D13ABFB6-B446-4F69-BB97-06167C96A95D / zenspider.com>
>   "Re: Test::Unit maintainer" on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:50:27 +0900,
>   Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby / zenspider.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Can I start to improve Test::Unit?
> > 
> > absolutely... how would you like to go about this?
> 
> My goal:
> 
>   * Easy to extend. (I think this is the same as yours.)
>     * Some or all GUI test runners will be provided as
>       separated package. (They may be gem)
>     * ...
> 
>   * Easy to write tests by default. (I think this is NOT the same as yours.)
>     As a result, the standard testing framework may not be
>     minimum.
>     * Built-in mock support.
>     * ...
> 
>   * Easy to debug by default. (I think this may conflict yours.)
>     As a result, the standard testing framework may not be
>     minimum.
>     * Built-in diff output between expected value and actual
>       value.
>     * ...
> 
> 
> > Personally, I think we should pull it into a separate repository and  
> > work there.
> 
> It's OK for me if developed testing framework become the
> standard testing framework. (I want the standard testing
> framework to satisfy the above my goal by default for happy
> testing with standard Ruby installation.)
> 
> > I'll register a project on rubyforge if one doesn't already exist.  
> > What is your rubyforge username? I'll add you as an admin.
> 
> It's 'kou'.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>