On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 07:22:56AM +0900, Berger, Daniel wrote:
> Do you think that could eventually be used for method annotations in a
> more general way? Is that what you ultimately have in mind? Or am I way
> off here?

This particular implementation could not be used for general method
annotatations, because it only works for CFUNCs.  Implementing the
feature for other method types requires a much bigger change to the
interpreter.

However, I can imagine many uses for a generalized annotation mechanism.

Paul