Hi,

In message "Re: [1.9] Proc#curry"
    on Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:24:33 +0900, David Flanagan <david / davidflanagan.com> writes:

|I'd like to ask, however, what the rationale is for adding this fairly 
|major new piece of API after 1.9.0.  I could see this going into the 2.0 
|development branch, when it opens, but do we need it in 1.9?  (I ask 
|this, obviously, as someone who has just written and published a book 
|covering Ruby 1.9--I'd really like the 1.9 API to stay stable!)

I consider this method (Proc#curry) to be trivial and should be
treated like an Easter egg for functional programming kids.

							matz.