Hi, In message "Re: [1.9] Proc#curry" on Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:24:33 +0900, David Flanagan <david / davidflanagan.com> writes: |I'd like to ask, however, what the rationale is for adding this fairly |major new piece of API after 1.9.0. I could see this going into the 2.0 |development branch, when it opens, but do we need it in 1.9? (I ask |this, obviously, as someone who has just written and published a book |covering Ruby 1.9--I'd really like the 1.9 API to stay stable!) I consider this method (Proc#curry) to be trivial and should be treated like an Easter egg for functional programming kids. matz.