On Jan 9, 2008 3:35 AM, David A. Black <dblack / rubypal.com> wrote:
> Hi --
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>
> > On Jan 9, 2008 1:14 AM, David A. Black <dblack / rubypal.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I might have missed this somewhere, but I'm wondering why p is now
> >> returning its argument
> >
> > To make it easy to drop in a p in a chain of methods.
>
> It's a private method, though, so it can't go in the middle of a
> chain, and it's also functional (i.e., p 1, rather than 1.p). I guess
> it could go at the beginning of a chain. I'm not sure I'm getting it,
> thoguh.

I guess I should have gone to bed instead of sending emails...