On Dec 10, 9:52 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto <m... / ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: redefineable not operator"
>     on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:52:44 +0900, Trans <transf... / gmail.com> writes:
>
> |Are you feeling okay, Matz?
>
> Fine, thank you.
>
> |But on a more pressing note, may I ask if more problematic issues are
> |being looked at too -- in light of the pending release? For instance,
> |I've not heard if the autoload issue, I've mentioned before, is being
> |addressed --that bug is a BIG DEAL for me. And there appears to be a
> |many other important issues listed in Tracker (though granted, I can't
> |really judge their merits).
>
> Maybe, _I_ am having problem with issue tracking.  Could you point me
> the reference again?

No problem:

  http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=15213&group_id=426&atid=1698

> |Okay... I guess this is one of those "please no new features; fix the
> |bugs we got" requests ;-)
>
> I consider myself in "feature polishing" mode now.  I know you might
> think it's too late.  I think it's better than having unsophisticated
> 1.9.
>
> For good news, I have no big change left.

Very good news then :-)

T.