On 06/11/2007, Luis Lavena <luislavena / gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/5/07, Wolfgang NĂ¡dasi-Donner <ed.odanow / wonado.de> wrote: > > Gregory Brown schrieb: > > > There is always the option of having a 'core' gem server which hosts > > > the bits that have been marooned from the stdlib, and maybe has a > > > meta-gem that'd install all of them. > > > > Is't something like the following scenario possible (may be even now)? > > > > 1) I have a Ruby application inside a subdirectory "/myappl", which I will > > deliver as a zip file (usually for Windows, but this shouldn't matter). > > > > Yeah, you can do that. > It's easy to distribute pure ruby extensions this way. However, every C extension that goes away from the stdlib makes distributing some applications way harder. You simply cannot include the extension for every possible platform. Thanks Michal