On 11/4/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb / cesmail.net> wrote:

> Well, I think this is one of those, "Oh gosh yes ... that's a *really*
> great idea ... but *I* just don't have the time" situations. The code
> base is growing, there are more developers, etc. Somehow all the major
> open source projects manage to get things done, and I doubt very
> seriously if Ruby will turn out to be any different in that respect.

Does anyone have some knowledge they can share of how different open
source languages handle their standard libraries?  That could be
helpful, and if we don't have that information, I could probably do a
little research...