On 10/3/07, Eric Hodel <drbrain / segment7.net> wrote:
> On Oct 3, 2007, at 08:59 , Jacob Fugal wrote:
> > On 10/3/07, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi <nakahiro / sarion.co.jp> wrote:
> >>
> >> ruby core team would like to include Rake in Ruby 1.9.  Let's discuss
> >> about importing Rake into Ruby's svn repository.
> >>
> >
> > Will Rake be "fully" bundled (core), or "pre-installed-gem" bundled
> > (std-lib)? My vote is for the latter.
>
> What difference does this make?

I'm mostly thinking of the discussion in the thread regarding
unbundling libraries so that they can still evolve and release on a
more rapid schedule than the core. I'd like to see rake able to have
that flexibility as well.

I'm definitely in favor of having rake available from the moment I
install ruby without needing to explicitly install the gem, but I
would also like to be able to update the rake gem without reinstalling
all of ruby (or waiting for a new ruby install to be available).

Jacob Fugal