Nobu,

I don't understand.  Does the latest 1.8.6 return the same result as I 
reported, or does it return the same result as 1.8.4 and 1.9.0?

	David

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> At Thu, 31 May 2007 07:28:59 +0900,
> David Flanagan wrote in [ruby-core:11367]:
>> A toplevel next statement in a lambda does not return a value in 1.8.6, 
>> but it does in both 1.8.4 and today's 1.9.0 build.
> 
> The latest 1.8.6 in SVN returns the same result.
>