Now that would be crazy now, wouldn't it? J

From: Alexey Verkhovsky [mailto:alexey.verkhovsky / gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:26 PM
To: ruby-core / ruby-lang.org
Subject: Re: Virtual classes and 'real' classes -- why?

On 3/28/07, John Lam (CLR) <jflam / microsoft.com<mailto:jflam / microsoft.com>=
> wrote:
Is this how things are actually implemented? (BTW I'm not lazy here - we ca=
nnot look for ourselves).

Sorry for being curious. Does this phrase mean that you are reimplementing =
Ruby (a complex language with no formal specification), and you are not all=
owed to look at the source code of the "reference implementation"?

--
Alex Verkhovsky