Issue #18381 has been updated by bkuhlmann (Brooke Kuhlmann).


Not sure if this helps, but [Ruby Standard Gems](https://stdgems.org) is always a great source of reference. I use it often, myself.

----------------------------------------
Bug #18381: Default vs Bundled gems
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18381#change-95031

* Author: vo.x (Vit Ondruch)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* ruby -v: ruby 3.1.0dev (2021-12-01 master 0b53a8895f) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Could there be documented what is the difference between default and bundled gems? E.g.

* Are the Bundled gems considered a part of StdLib or not?
* What is general strategy for the future, seeing more and more gems moving from default to bundled gems in Ruby 3.1
* Default gems does not need to be listed in Gemfile where Bundled gems needs to be listed in Gemfile
* Default gems can be used without RubyGems where Bundled gems requires RubyGems




-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request / ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>